POLARIZER PROBLEM: PART 2
Last blog post we looked at a problem I recently stumbled upon when photographing a waterfall and stream and what I did to correct it. If you didn't read it and are interested click HERE. This post we are going to look at another common problem when using circular polarizers on a wide angle lens. Most of the time I don't use a circular polarizer on a wide angle lens unless there is little sky in the image. Let's take a look at a situation where I wanted to use a wide angle lens and a circular polarizer and see what happens.
THE PROBLEM
Below is a scene I ran came upon while visiting the coast. This is the image without using a polarizer. The sun had just risen to the left and was 90 degrees to the scene making this a perfect candidate for using a polarizer. While normally I do not use a polarizer when photographing with a wide angle, I wanted to cut down on the glare in the water. The problem is that there is a large portion of blue sky present in the image.
Original image without polarization
When using a wide angle lens and a polarizer at full effect you end up with an artifact that is hard to correct in post processing. The polarizer helped to remove the glare from the water but also created the dreaded "UFO" splotch in the sky.
Full effect of polarizer creates blue oblong artifact in sky
THESOLUTION
Easy! I simply backed off the polarizer effect by turning the polarizer until some of the glare was removed from the water while also removing the dreaded blue "UFO" from the sky! No more alien invasion!
Reduced effect of polarizer removes some glare off of water while not producing artifact in sky
Final image
Remember that you don't have to use the full effect of a polarizer everytime. You can change the amount of polarization by turing the polarizer until you get just the right amount you need for the scene. A circular polarizer is a great tool and definately should be in your camera bag if you are a landscape photographer! But just like any tool it can have negative effects. Just be aware of them and you will get the image you envisioned.
Explore | Compose | Capture | Publish
Comments
============================================
A closer look
How to Interpret StonkFun Revenue Dashboards is a question best approached through market structure rather than price predictions. This guide concentrates on which time windows and definitions should be compared. The focus is StonkFun, a Solana-based token launchpad where newly created coins can be paired with different supported quote assets. For readers searching terms such as stonk launch xyz or stonfun, the important task is to understand what the platform does and where the risks remain. No launch mechanism can guarantee liquidity, earnings or a favorable trading outcome.
An often overlooked aspect is which time windows and definitions should be compared. Readers can use this distinction to ask sharper questions instead of relying on hype. An onchain ledger makes it possible to inspect transactions, but the interpretation still matters. Dashboards may differ in definitions, asset pricing, indexing coverage and the treatment of recipient payouts. A credible analysis explains these limitations before making comparisons.
Implications for users
The discussion becomes more useful when it focuses on daily, seven-day and thirty-day figures capture different market conditions. It is worth separating an interface description from the results a user may actually experience. Revenue terminology needs discipline. Trading volume is the notional amount exchanged; fees are charges associated with that activity; protocol revenue is the part attributed to the platform under a particular accounting method. Creator earnings and holder distributions may be additional, distinct categories.
Important distinctions
To understand how to interpret stonkfun revenue dashboards, begin with avoid mixing cumulative revenue with a single-day snapshot. This shifts attention from a promotional slogan to an observable feature of how a market operates. Buybacks and burns are sometimes described as a flywheel, but that metaphor should not hide the moving pieces. One needs to know which fee streams are eligible, which transactions actually occurred, which tokens were purchased, and whether burned supply can be independently verified.
Closing observations
For a grounded assessment, Daily, seven-day and thirty-day figures capture different market conditions. At the same time, avoid mixing cumulative revenue with a single-day snapshot. A search for stonckfun may lead to similarly named projects, so use verified contract and product details instead of assuming that spelling alone identifies a particular token. This is educational context, not trading advice or a recommendation to buy any digital asset.
===================================
Start with the basics
Are Launchpad Revenues Predictable? is a question best approached through market structure rather than price predictions. This guide concentrates on how crypto market cycles influence transaction demand. The focus is StonkFun, a Solana-based token launchpad where newly created coins can be paired with different supported quote assets. For readers searching terms such as stonk dot fun or stonk revenue, the important task is to understand what the platform does and where the risks remain. No launch mechanism can guarantee liquidity, earnings or a favorable trading outcome.
One practical way to approach this subject is to examine how crypto market cycles influence transaction demand. The difference matters because two similar-looking charts can represent very different risks. Time frames matter. A single active day can dominate a weekly average, while a cumulative figure keeps growing as historical activity accumulates. Analysts should label every number with its period and avoid extrapolating a brief surge into an annual guarantee.
Why the detail matters
An often overlooked aspect is launch frequency and trading volume can vary sharply between periods. Readers can use this distinction to ask sharper questions instead of relying on hype. Fee allocation can vary by launch mode and stage of a market. The stated creator share on one screen is not automatically a universal commission across every product or every date. Traders should look for current documentation and distinguish illustrative examples from guaranteed payments.
Risks and limitations
The discussion becomes more useful when it focuses on past fee generation is not a dependable projection. It is worth separating an interface description from the results a user may actually experience. Neither high protocol revenue nor token burns by themselves establish that a token is underpriced. Financial claims should connect an observable mechanism to a carefully limited conclusion, rather than leap from activity to a promised return.
Putting it together
For a grounded assessment, Launch frequency and trading volume can vary sharply between periods. At the same time, past fee generation is not a dependable projection. A search for stronkfun may lead to similarly named projects, so use verified contract and product details instead of assuming that spelling alone identifies a particular token. This is educational context, not trading advice or a recommendation to buy any digital asset.